Posts Tagged 'Bankruptcy Judge Scott Yun'

Judge Yun’s Contribution Conclusion

Posted by:

IV. CONCLUSION

Confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan is denied under 11 U.S.C.
§§ 109(e) and 1325(a)(6). Due to the inability to confirm a plan, the Debtor’s bankruptcy case shall be converted back to chapter 7 to allow her to obtain a discharge and her fresh start under the Bankruptcy Code. The court shall enter an order converting the case in accordance with this memorandum decision.

Continue Reading →
0

Bankruptcy Judge Scott Yun and Contributions

Posted by:

The Judge went on to say…

More specifically, the contribution from Boyfriend does not constitute stable and regular income due to the nature of his relationship with the Debtor. Courts generally reject contributions made by a live-in boyfriend or girlfriend. Jordan, 226 B.R. at 119–20; In re Heck, 355 B.R. 813, 824–25 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006); In re Fischel, 103 B.R. 44, 49 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989). This is not to say that contributions from a live-in boyfriend or girlfriend can never ...

Continue Reading →
0

Judge Yun and Chapter 13 Contributions

Posted by:

The Judge further explained:

3. Conclusionon Feasibility

The contributions from Boyfriend or, alternatively, Mother are not supported by sufficient admissible evidence to prove that the contributions are reliable and likely to continue for the duration of the Plan. Without the contribution income, the Debtor’s net monthly income drops to ($210.00) and she is unable to meet her own expenses, much less make the proposed plan payments of $490.00. Therefore, the court finds that the Debtor has failed to provide sufficient evidence to ...

Continue Reading →
0

Judge Yun and Contribution declarations cont.

Posted by:

The Judge then talked about how the Mother’s contribution in the chapter 13 was not stable and therefore could not be used…

2. Contributions by Mother

The evidence is also insufficient for the court to determine that the proposed “back-up” contributions from the Debtor’s mother are sufficiently reliable to render the Debtor’s Plan feasible.

The showing under the first factor is stronger because Mother is the Debtor’s mother and it could be inferred that the familial connection provides her motivation for supporting the ...

Continue Reading →
0

Judge Yun and Contributions Part 4

Posted by:

Judge Yun continued his analysis in his chapter 13 case discussing contribution declarations:

1. Contributions by Boyfriend

In the present case, the Debtor has failed to provide sufficient evidence to persuade the court that the contributions from Boyfriend meet the requirements to establish feasibility. First, the only evidence submitted regarding Boyfriend’s relationship to the Debtor and his motivation to make the contributions merely indicates that he lives with the Debtor. Boyfriend Decl. ¶ 1. Counsel’s representations at the confirmation hearing that Boyfriend ...

Continue Reading →
0

Judge Yun and Contribution Declaration

Posted by:

Recently Riverside Bankruptcy Judge Yun had a chapter 13 case in which the Debtor could not make all the plan payment by herself. She had to have contribution from family or friend in order to come up with the monthly plan payment. This is a normal occurrence in the Central District of California.

Judge Yun though, issued an opinion in which he held that the debtor was not entailed to file a  chapter 13 plan since she did not have enough ...

Continue Reading →
0

New Judge In Riverside Bankruptcy

Posted by:

 

This week we said goodbye to our Judge Deborah Saltzman as she had her last hearing in Riverside. She is now a Los Angeles Bankruptcy Judge and will share duties in Santa Barbara, CA.

I remember when Judge Saltzman came to Riverside as a new Judge and now she is on her way to Los Angeles. I will miss Judge Saltzman and wish her well in the big city.

Our new Judge is Judge Scott H. Yon and here was his official ...

Continue Reading →
0